(Sam, insert my hilarious sound effects here)
Cause I'm a poor victimized moron, dur de dur. ::does moron dance with sound effects::
Putting racial insults aside (although that was clearly the comment of a bigot), putting aside the obvious, terrifying problem of gun violence, I have to say, I am opposed to this law.
Before you jump to conculsions, I must say that I don't like guns. They make me uncomfortable. I have no plans to own a gun, and I hope I never face a situation where I am confronted by someone with a gun. Plus, I don't care about my right to bear arms and I don't care about yours either. I have no desire to ever bear arms, thank you.
That said, this does not seem to be about controlling gun violence. This seems to be another product of our litigious society. It's got to be someone's fault. The perpetrator never acts alone anymore.
When I read this article, it looked as if this law seems to have precedent to me: the ability of smokers to sue tabacco companies because cigarettes, apparently, cause disease and reduction in quality of life.
::gasp:: Did you know this? I just thought they made you look cool.
You smoked. That was your choice. And now you are dying. Too bad. Only you can make you smoke for 20+ years! Sure, you didn't want to get shot, but gun manufacturers probably didn't want you to get shot either. Who did? The shooter. Unless he was sold that gun from a manufacterer by illegal means only the shooter can be responsible for what happens after he gets it home from the store.
It's everybody's fault but the guy whodunit. Why? That guy doesn't have as much money as giant faceless corporations!
BTW, I really don't like cigarettes either. But I still like them a little more than guns.
[Disclaimer: This is just my ill-informed, 20-minutes-in-the-making opinion. You and I both know that I could be wrong. Very wrong, even.]
You are reading the life, times, and general musings of Jenna Tollerson. I am an independent web developer living in and around Athens, Georgia, USA. [read more]